Council Votes 'No Confidence' in Police Chief

The vote passed by a 4-3 vote with newcomer Councilman Peter Smith casting the deciding vote.

The Anne Arundel County Council passed a vote of no confidence in Police Chief James Teare Sr. on Monday by a narrow margin.

The legislation, sponsored by Jerry Walker (R-7th District), originally called for Teare to be suspended by the county executive. But after talking with county attorneys, Walker said he decided to change the wording to "a vote of no confidence in Chief Teare's ability to lead the police department."

Council Chairman Derek Fink (R-3rd District) called the motion “political grandstanding,” by Walker. Fink joked with Councilman John Grasso (R-2nd District) during the meeting that it was merely a tactic of Walker’s to get their names in newspaper headlines.

Walker said he drafted the legislation in response to , during which Davis said dysfunction within the police administration has given the department a "black eye."

“A vote against this resolution is equivalent to an ostrich sticking its head in the sand in an attempt to ignore the facts,” Walker said.

Fink questioned Walker's basis for such a strong assertion and said the council was taking an action that would “ruin” Teare’s career.

“I think we’re condemning this man,” Fink said. “He has been charged with nothing, he has been found guilty of nothing and he has done, to the best of our knowledge, nothing wrong.”

The council subpoenaed Teare for questioning in March, but during their interview, . Teare said that his answers would be in violation of the grand jury's secrecy laws. The Maryland state prosecutor is currently investigating allegations of misconduct by County Executive John R. Leopold.

During the council’s vote, newcomer Councilman Peter Smith (D-1st District) hesitated, holding the gaze of his councilmen for a few moments before voting in favor of the resolution. It passed by a 4-3 vote with councilmen Dick Ladd (R-5th District), Fink and Grasso voting no.

After the meeting, Smith said during that moment of pause he was gauging how a commander’s leadership affects the rank-and-file both in the police department and in the military. He said that helped him make his decision.

“In the military, if it’s found that a commander’s leadership has inspired a lack of confidence, they can be relieved,” Smith said. “In this instance, I think the military and the police department are very similar in their command structure.”

jesse55jp April 17, 2012 at 04:34 PM
Fink and Grasso have never served in any military or paramilitary organization to my knowledge. They know NOTHING of what it means to work as a rank and file troop under someone who you do not believe in. The fire dept feels the same way about the fire chief. Its gonna be great when all four are gone if this county doesn't have some sort of mass exodus.
Margie April 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM
If you have ever been to a council meeting Fink & Grasso seem to find lots to joke about while sitting up on the council, apparently they don't listen to anything said by those testifying, their opinion has already been bought , I mean made. I didn't see Fink making too many jokes when the ethics committee found his involvement with his business partners to be a conflict.. yeah, they hold a reign on his employment status, ultimately his livelyhood, so he casts his votes in favor of developers, etc instead of his consituents. Leopold was the police chief's commanding officer, as part of his position he had to work for someone he didn't agree with, a system similar to to the military. He was doing his job, not working for the highest bidder.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »