.
Feedback

The Cost of Inaction

Governor Martin O’Malley, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr. and House Speaker Michael E. Busch unveil a plan to address Maryland’s transportation needs.

By Takirra Winfield, Press Secretary

Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated or unsafe costs Maryland commuters $6.2 billion each year.

  • Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated or unsafe costs the average DC commuter 67 hours of lost time, 32 gallons of wasted gas, and $2,195 out-of-pocket each year.
  • Driving on roads that are congested, deteriorated or unsafe costs the average Baltimore commuter 41 hours of lost time, 19 gallons of wasted gas, and $1,781 out-of-pocket each year.

 

This blog is posted on 49 sites throughout Maryland. Join the statewide conversation in comments! Find other Patch sites here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Glen Burnie Patch? Find your Local Patch »

JD1 March 5, 2013 at 04:42 am
Keep 18 wheelers off of main commuter roads from 630-830 am and from 330-530 pm. Try that first and see how much commuters save before stealing more $$ for the slush fund. Eliminate the emissions testing program - it's just another tax/fee. Next - get your governor pals and state legislators to fight the BS Reformulated Gasoline Program requirement issued by the criminals at the EPA that causes increases in prices and refineries to have to shut down limiting supplies. Then, if you need a few more cents per gallon, so be it.
Skip727 March 5, 2013 at 11:10 am
Very pretty graphic, Miss Winfield. Have you looked at the price of consumer goods lately? The cost of Governor O'Malley's actions (tax increases and out of control spending) are costing Marylanders more and more each day. Spending like he (Governor O'Malley) has a bottomless wallet has cost Marylanders plenty but then what does he care, right? He is only interested in his next political gig.
JustABill March 5, 2013 at 02:25 pm
I love how the title of this pathetically inept attempt to prove an imaginary need to raise taxes on Maryland once again is, "The Cost Of Inaction" when the real issue is what the Governor's actions will ultimately end up costing.
The story not being told is the inaction that already cost Maryland Citizens billions of dollars when the Governor failed to return the money he and the General Assembly raided from the Transportation Trust Fund that was left fully funded by Governor Ehrlich to pay for all of the transportation projects currently underway when Governor O'Malley took office. If that money had never been taken out of the TTF then there would be no need to raise the gasoline tax at a time when gasoline is certain to surpass the $4 mark. This is just one more opportunity for the Governor to prove to us all that he really does not have a shred of concern for the needs of the poor and middle class by increasing another tax simply to make up his own prior actions and ultimately his inaction when it comes to demonstrating even a shred of fiscal restraint.
JCG March 5, 2013 at 05:57 pm
Congratulation Merry-Landers!! You CONTINUE to vote for these idiots....time after time after time.
I want to see an accounting of all the money that was in the transportation fund previously. The money was squandered. It is, and will continue to be a slush fund with OWE'Malley in charge. BTW, have you seen the new signs at our state borders?? They say " Welcome To Maryland---What's In Your Wallet"??
Tim March 5, 2013 at 06:35 pm
Cost of inaction? With O'Malley specifically, it's more the cost of his action.
CP March 5, 2013 at 07:02 pm
Just looking at that philanderer gives me diarrhea.
ZIG March 5, 2013 at 08:06 pm
Presidential candidate O'malley paticipated in the thefts fom the transportation trust fund. He helped cause this crisis. I do not feel he acts in our best interest.
Tim March 5, 2013 at 09:00 pm
In all seriousness, I'm mildly perplexed at his new gas tax proposal. Maybe one of you folks can explain this to me.
I've read news articles (multiple) on the proposal. It essentially raises the cost of gas 9 cents a gallon over the course of two years(wholesale level)....BUT....first they reduce the existing gas tax by 5 cents on the consumer end (finished product). What??? Why not just raise the price of gas by 4 cents a gallon over the course of two years instead at the consumer/end level? Now, I understand that they are altering where the taxation takes place (wholesale level, versus end product level) but as I'm not a gasoline economist, I'm really not sure what the benefit is. My best guess (and thats all this is) is that it better enables the government to collect revenue based on the market price of wholesale gasoline(as this is linked to the price of oil). This works when oil is expensive, like it's been the past 5-6 years. However, if for some strange reason oil started trading at 50 dollars a barrel in a few years...they are going to wish they increased the tax per gallon at the consumer level instead (and probably try reversing this through legislation).
JustABill March 5, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Tim the lack of clear concise logical thinking put into this tax hike is not much of a surprise because it is coming from Governor O'Malley but I do believe the idea of charging the tax at the wholesale level was clearly thought out as a marketing ploy of sorts. The cynic in me suspects this is so O'Malley, Miller, Busch, and their spokespeople like Ms. Winfield can spin it as if the evil big oil companies will be the ones getting charged the tax and not the consumer. Of course this is complete BS but as long as they can get that spin out on the news enough times the blissfully blind liberal voters of Maryland will buy right into the myth.
I'm sure at some point we will see MOM in a few press ops look down at the camera with a little tear in his eye and his lower lip curled in slightly as he utters his favorite words... "It's for the children."
Tim March 6, 2013 at 03:43 pm
That's a possibility, there are a lot of ignorant/stupid people who will just read 'the gas tax per gallon" is down 5 cents and think "what tax". Wouldn't surprise me at all if this was a contributing factor (the jedi mind trick, if you will :) ).
ZIG March 6, 2013 at 08:53 pm
This will probably go to referendum. Let's kill it.
JustABill March 6, 2013 at 09:46 pm
Exactly! Like when he claims to have cut spending by 500 million dollars but the reality is he increased spending by 3.5 billion and then cut the increase by 500 million. He just waves his hand in the air and tells the blind faithful of Maryland, this is a spending reduction, a fee is not a tax, I will lower your BGE bills, these are not the droids you are looking for, and his all time favorite go to lie, it's for the children.
Steve March 6, 2013 at 09:48 pm
Put a $5 each way toll on I-83 at the MD/PA line.
Grace B. March 7, 2013 at 03:57 am
When the PH Patch had an editor, it was one of the few Patch sites that never showed O'Money's face, or his blogs. What's up now? I can't bear to look at him every time I stop by to check for new crime in the area. It's like adding insult to injury.
JustABill March 7, 2013 at 04:41 am
Zig it is my understanding that this is an appropriations bill and therefore cannot be put up for a referendum.
Tim March 7, 2013 at 05:51 am
That's kinda false, this is far from the first Owe'Malley blog linked here.
We see one about every 2-3 weeks I'd guess.-=
Tim March 7, 2013 at 05:52 am
no, just one way - going south into Maryland :)
jag March 7, 2013 at 09:49 pm
...how has O'Malley increased the price of consumer goods in your mind? Curious.
jag March 7, 2013 at 10:06 pm
Tim, the bill's two main points are 1. phasing in the sales tax which gasoline has been exempt from for so long (2% this year, 2% next year) and 2. peg the gas tax (which would be lowed by 5 cents) to inflation.
The main point of #1 is to buffer against increased fuel efficiency (which obviously lowers the per-gallon gas tax windfall) and to take advantage of ever-increasing gasoline costs. You're right that gas prices could go down, but that's almost certainly not going to happen unless the world economy collapses again. We'll have bigger problems than a few cents in lost sales tax revenue on gasoline if that's the case. #2, pegging the gas tax to inflation just makes sense since everyone would just complain if the gas tax was manually raised every few years. Just like they are now after over 2 decades of not raising it. Road users have been paying a smaller and smaller share of the cost of road construction and maintenance and we simply can't continue with a 1993 gas tax rate. Currently, MD's gas tax, tolls, fees, etc. only pay for about 1/3 of the cost of roads. The rest of the cost is subsidized by the general public which makes exactly zero sense. Continuing to raid the general fund to pay for transportation is not a way out of the mess a generation of sprawled road infrastructure has caused.
JustABill March 8, 2013 at 02:00 am
jag, Perhaps this is too complex for you to comprehend but when the cost of doing business or delivering a product to the market place is increased by various taxes, tolls, fees, and other government related expenses the consumer price will certainly increase as well. It is a very simple concept that most kids with a well run lemonade stand can grasp but it seems to be far too challenging for many of the liberal minds running our state government in Annapolis.
StevenBarnes March 11, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Gov O'Malley please stop this foolishness by the Md Senate.
OUTRAGE: MD Politicians Urge $1.8 Million Corporate Welfare for Lockheed Martin // PLUS: Bill Sponsor Dating Their Lobbyist? http://www.marylandjuice.com/2013/03/outrage-md-politicians-urge-18-million.html
Amy Leahy March 14, 2013 at 04:49 pm
What OweMalley doesn't publicize is that there is still no lockbox proposed on the Transportation Trust Fund and the bill links future increases (automatic) to the Consumer Price Index. May as well open your veins - the bloodletting will never stop.
Meg March 16, 2013 at 01:31 am
I'm sorry, but I'm still bitter about my local community being steamrolled via the Hatem Bridge fiasco to pay for O'Malley's complete blundering of the ICC finances. Forgive me if I don't trust any further proposals he has in regards to transportation funding.
TJ March 17, 2013 at 11:01 pm
We already know he will raise taxes just to steal the money AGAIN. Let them steal from the other funds to pay back the BILLION they took from the Transportation fund. Fair is fair. The roads are in bad shape because of O,Malley and friends.
Tom Fitzpatrick March 30, 2013 at 01:40 pm
The sad thing about so many of these comments is that if the price of gas went up 4 cents tomorrow just because the oil companies raised it, no one would notice. If the money goes into Exxon's pocket or the pocket of some Arab oil sheik, who cares?
But increase a tax that hasn't been increased in twenty years so we can have better roads, and the public howls!!!!!!!!!!!
TJ March 30, 2013 at 06:08 pm
That's because the Government " could " do something to lower the cost of gas but Obama wants the price of gas high so the electric cars don't look so bad as far as price. Then when the Government wants to add on to the outragest price, yes, we have a problem with it.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Edward April 22, 2013 at 04:55 pm
Too bad this ends before the Warrior Run on the 18th and 19th... Bet there would be some seriousRead More competition afterwards for the Mess Masters... http://www.warriordash.com/media.php